nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 06, No.529 25-30
基于SPEI与R/S分析法的1961~2020年黑龙江省干旱时空特征分析及预测
基金项目(Foundation): 黑龙江省省属高等学校基本科研业务(2022-KYYWF-1074)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15920/j.cnki.22-1179/tv.2026.06.005
发布时间: 2026-05-21
出版时间: 2026-05-21
移动端阅读
摘要:

基于1961~2020年长达60年的气象数据,采用标准化降水蒸散指数(Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index)与R/S分析法结合短期历史数据,系统分析了该区域多时间尺度的干旱特征和干旱预测。研究结果表明,黑龙江省干旱程度以轻至中度干旱为主。在空间分布上,干旱呈现“西干东湿”的格局。全省在91.7%的年份中均出现区域性乃至全域性干旱,反映出干旱影响范围广泛。通过R/S分析方法对SPEI数据与历史数据相结合进行未来趋势预测,结果显示2027~2029年期间将进入枯水期,表明未来1~3年内黑龙江省可能面临较严峻的干旱形势。

Abstract:

This study systematically analyzed multi-temporal scale drought characteristics and drought prediction in the region.Based on 60 years of meteorological data from 1961 to 2020,the researchers combined the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index(SPEI) with R/S analysis method and short-term historical data.The results indicate that drought severity in Heilongjiang Province is mainly mild to moderate.In terms of spatial distribution,drought presents a pattern of “dry in the west and wet in the east”,with particularly significant drying trends in the western and southwestern regions.Notably,regional or even province-wide drought occurred in 91.7% of the years,reflecting the extensive impact range of drought.Through R/S analysis combined with SPEI data and historical data for future trend prediction,the results show that the period from 2027 to 2029 will enter a dry period,indicating that Heilongjiang Province may face a relatively severe drought situation in the next 1 to 3 years.In addition,different drought years show distinct drought characteristics,with higher drought risks in spring and autumn.This study provides important scientific basis for formulating drought prevention and control strategies in Heilongjiang Province.

参考文献

[1]刘玉莲,李秀芬,康恒元,等.1961—2023年黑龙江省多尺度干旱时空特征[J].干旱气象,2025,43(2):186-194.

[2]杨王华,刘志娟,巩敬锦,等.东北地区未来春玉米干旱风险时空分布及对气候变化的响应[J].中国农业科学,2024,57(12):2336-2349.

[3]Vicente-Serrano S M,Begueria S,Lopez-Moreno J I.A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming:The standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index[J].Journal of Climate,2010,23(7):1696-1718.

[4]颜雅琼,申双和,岳元,等.多时间尺度下黑龙江省1980—2014年干湿演变特征及主导因子分析[J].气象科学,2020,40(2):200-208.

[5]刘珂,姜大膀.基于两种潜在蒸散发算法的SPEI对中国干湿变化的分析[J].大气科学,2015,39(1):23-36.

[6]Hurst H E.Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs[J].Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers,1951,116:770-808.

[7]MANDELBROT B,WALLIS J R.Robustness of the rescaled range R/S in the measurement of noncyclic long run statistical dependence[J].Water Resources Research,1969,5(5):967-988.

[8]Tong S,Lai Q,Zhang J,et al.Spatiotemporal drought variability on the Mongolian Plateau from 1980-2014 based on the SPE I-PM,intensity analysis and Hurst exponent[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,615:1557-1565.

[9]Alien R G,Pereira L S,Raes D,et al.Crop EvapotranspirationGuidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56[R].Rome:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations,1998:300.

[10]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局.中国国家标准化管理委员会.气象干旱等级:GB/T 20481-2006[S].2006。

[11]田甜,黄强,郭爱军,等.基于标准化降水蒸散指数的渭河流域干旱演变特征分析[J].水力发电学报,2016,35(2):16-27.

[12]黎扬兵,张洪波,任冲锋,等.基于TRMM降尺度数据的渭河流域干旱时空演变特征与重心迁移规律研究[J].华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版),2023,44(3):14-24.

[13]李崇瑞,游松财,武永峰.东北地区干旱特征与春玉米生长季干旱主导气象因子[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(19):97-106.

[14]王莹,张舒,徐永清,等.近50a黑龙江省5—9月气象干旱及大气环流异常特征[J].干旱气象,2023,41(4):540-549.

基本信息:

DOI:10.15920/j.cnki.22-1179/tv.2026.06.005

中图分类号:P426.616

引用信息:

[1]于超舟,姜宁,郑恩楠.基于SPEI与R/S分析法的1961~2020年黑龙江省干旱时空特征分析及预测[J].吉林水利,2026,No.529(06):25-30.DOI:10.15920/j.cnki.22-1179/tv.2026.06.005.

基金信息:

黑龙江省省属高等学校基本科研业务(2022-KYYWF-1074)

发布时间:

2026-05-21

出版时间:

2026-05-21

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文