| 493 | 16 | 81 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
本文采用野外生态学方法,于2016—2018年6月和9月对北京密云水库浮游植物多样性及水生态环境进行了研究。结果表明,密云水库浮游植物共检出8门56属108种,浮游植物平均密度为3.66×106ind./L,平均生物量为7.90mg/L,优势种为尖脆杆藻(Fragilaria acus),种类组成、密度和生物量均以绿藻和硅藻为主,蓝藻占比适中,但种类和密度仍较多。蓝藻存在显示有富营养化和水华爆发的可能。除氮磷指标外,其余理化指标均处在国家标准Ⅰ-Ⅱ类,氮磷仍是潜在富营养化因素。总之,南水北调后,密云水库浮游植物群落结构复杂,浮游植物在种类组成和数量上变化明显,多样性和均匀性均较好,但仍预示着潜在的水华和富营养化风险。水质多为中营养状态,水质状况总体良好,但仍存在氮磷含量高和富营养化等问题,水库控制氮磷负荷仍不容忽视。
Abstract:In this paper,the authors carried out the study on phytoplankton diversity and water ecological environment for Miyun reservoir in Beijing from the year 2016 to 2018 by means of field ecological method.The results show that there are 8 categories,56 spcies,and 108 kinds of phytoplankton being discovered in Miyun reservoir,its average density is about 3.66*106 ind./L,the average biomass is 7.90 mg/L,the dominant species is Fragilaria acus,and the species composition,density and biomass are all mainly green alga and diatom,the proportion of blue-green algae is moderate,while its species and density are still more.Blue-green algae exist shows that it is possible for the eutrophication and the algal bloom break out.Apart from nitrogen and phosphorus indexes,other physical and chemical ones are all satisfied with the national standards Ⅰ-Ⅱ,and nitrogen and phosphorus are still potential factors resulting in the eutrophication.In a word,after implementation of of South to North Water Diversion Project,the structure of phytoplankton coenosium is complicated in Miyun reservoir,the variation of phytoplankton in species and quantities is obvious,and both its diversity and uniformity are better,but there are still potential risk that the eutrophication and the algal bloom break out.Most of water quality in the reservoir are the mesotrophic state,the water quality situation as a whole is good,while there are still the problems about high contents of nitrogen and phosphorus in the water and the eutrophication.The work to control contents of nitrogen and phosphorus can not be still ignored for managers of the reservoir.
[1]胡涛,魏开建,张桂蓉,等.密云水库大型底栖动物群落结构及水质生物学评价[J].水生态学杂志,2018,39(4):79-88.
[2]吴晓辉,吴钢,潘轲旻,等.南水北调来水对密云水库水质和水生生物影响的预测分析[J].北京水务,2015(6):4-6.
[3]乔敏敏,季宏兵,朱先芳,等.密云水库入库河流沉积物中重金属形态分析及风险评价[J].环境科学学报,2013,33(12):3324-3333.
[4]贾东民,王景仕,薛新娟,等.密云水库浮游藻类特征研究[J].北京水务,2013(1):12-16.
[5]周萌,李裴,王忠锁.密云水库浮游动物多样性格局[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013,34(6):33-42.
[6]王晓丹,翟振华,赵爽,等.密云水库不同季节细菌群落多样性[J].生态学报,2009,29(7):3919-3927.
[7]国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.《水和废水监测分析方法》[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
[8]王明翠,刘雪芹,张建辉.湖泊富营养化评价方法及分级标准[J].中国环境监测,2002(5):47-49.
[9]国家环境保护总局.GB 3838-2002地表水环境质量标准[S].北京:中国标准出版社.
[10]赵文.养殖水域生态学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2011.
[11]刘熠,杨习文,任鹏,等.长江湖口段春夏季仔稚鱼群落结构研究[J].水生生物学报,2019,43(1):142-154.
[12]杨文,朱津永,陆开宏,等.淡水浮游植物功能类群分类法的提出、发展及应用[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1833-1840.
[13]李东青,梁籍,张立燕,等.密云库区1991~2011年水质变化趋势研究[J].中国环境科学,2015,35(6):1675-1685.
[14]李万智,杨进新,石维新,等.南水入密云水库对水质及水环境的影响[J].人民黄河,2019,41(3):89-93,99.
[15]张煦,熊晶,程继雄,等.丹江口水库湖北库区水质分区及长期变化趋势[J].中国环境监测,2016,32(1):64-69.
[16]郭凯,赵文,焉鸿启.柴河水库浮游生物群落结构的时空格局及其渔产力研究[J].水生态学杂志,2013,34(6):22-26.
[17]Zhang X,Xie P,Chen FZ,et al.Present status and changes of the phytoplankton community after invasion of Neosalanx taihuensis since 1982 in a deep oligotrophic plateau lake, Lake Fuxian in the subtropical China[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2005,17(3):389-394.
[18]何志辉.中国湖泊和水库的营养分类[J].大连水产学院学报,1987,(1):1-10.
基本信息:
DOI:10.15920/j.cnki.22-1179/tv.2020.05.001
中图分类号:Q948.8;X173;X826
引用信息:
[1]王哲,尹东鹏,赵文,等.南水北调后密云水库浮游植物多样性及水生态环境评价[J].吉林水利,2020,No.456(05):1-6+17.DOI:10.15920/j.cnki.22-1179/tv.2020.05.001.
基金信息:
北京市农业农村局项目(2016-2018)
2020-05-15
2020-05-15